Back to product
Download PDF
OneHarvestONEHARVEST
Executive Procurement Brief

Big Bad Mats

Procurement Cost Benefit & Unit Economics Analysis

Reducing Total Project Cost Through Engineered Ground Protection

Prepared for
Procurement DirectorsStrategic SourcingCategory ManagersConstruction Ops DirectorsProject ExecutivesEstimatorsFleet ManagersCFOsProject Controls

Big Bad Mats should be evaluated as a Total Project Cost Reduction investment — not simply as a rental or equipment purchase.

01

Executive Summary

Procurement decisions are often driven by purchase price. Yet on heavy civil construction projects, the largest costs are not generated at the point of purchase — they are generated in the field, through the hidden operational losses that accumulate across a project's life.

Equipment downtime
Labor inefficiency
Weather delays
Temporary access construction
Site restoration
Equipment recovery
Environmental incidents
Schedule extensions

Positioned correctly, Big Bad Mats functions as infrastructure that reduces these hidden project costs — converting a line-item expense into a measurable driver of project economics.

"The lowest purchase price rarely delivers the lowest total project cost."

02

Why Procurement Should Evaluate Total Cost

Procurement should optimize lifecycle value rather than initial expenditure. Each layer below compounds into the number that actually appears on the project P&L.

01
Initial Purchase Price
The visible line item
02
Operational Productivity
Uptime, throughput, crew efficiency
03
Schedule Performance
Fewer delays, faster completion
04
Risk Reduction
Safety, environmental & damage exposure
05
Total Installed Project Cost
The number that matters
03

Scenario-Based Financial Analysis

Three representative deployments demonstrate how return scales with project size and complexity.

Scenario A30-day
Small Site Access Project
29%ROI
Investment$18,000
Cost Avoidance$23,200
Net Benefit$5,200
Payback
23 Days
Return on Investment
29%
Scenario B45-day
Medium Civil Construction Project
228%ROI
Investment$25,000
Cost Avoidance$82,000
Net Benefit$57,000
Payback
14 Days
Return on Investment
228%
Scenario C60-day
Large Infrastructure Project
427%ROI
Investment$35,000
Cost Avoidance$184,500
Net Benefit$149,500
Payback
8 Days
Return on Investment
427%
04

Unit Economics Breakdown

10
Heavy equipment assets
25
Person field crew
45
Day project
$250/hr
Equipment operating cost
$75/hr
Burdened labor
3.8 : 1
Benefit-to-cost ratio

Estimated daily economic value created

Equipment productivity$500/day
Labor efficiency$275/day
Reduced rework$300/day
Schedule acceleration$700/day
Reduced restoration$180/day
Risk reduction$160/day
Total Daily Economic Benefit$2,115/day
45-Day Value Created
$95,175
Big Bad Mats Investment
$25,000
Net Financial Benefit
$70,175
Benefit-to-Cost Ratio
3.8 : 1
05

Cost Drivers Eliminated

Engineered access solutions attack the largest hidden project costs at their source.

Equipment downtime
Idle machines waiting on stable ground.
Labor waiting
Crews standing by during access failures.
Machine recovery
Extracting bogged-down equipment.
Temporary road construction
Gravel, timber & rebuild cycles.
Soft ground delays
Lost days on unstable subgrade.
Rain delays
Weather shutdowns on bare ground.
Site restoration
Regrading and re-vegetation at closeout.
Environmental remediation
Rutting, runoff & sensitive-area impact.
Safety incidents
Slips, tips & unstable-surface events.
Equipment damage
Wear from operating on poor ground.
06

Procurement Decision Matrix

Traditional Procurement
  • Lowest upfront cost
  • Price-focused
  • Reactive
  • Unknown lifecycle costs
Value-Based Procurement
  • Lowest total project cost
  • Productivity-focused
  • Risk-managed
  • Quantifiable ROI
  • Faster project completion
  • Reduced operational variability
07

Executive Financial Dashboard

Representative 45-day civil construction project. Figures are illustrative and vary by site conditions, equipment mix, and schedule.

$25,000
Investment
$82,000
Est. Cost Avoidance
$57,000
Net Financial Benefit
228%
Return on Investment
3.3 : 1
Benefit-to-Cost Ratio
14 Days
Payback Period
~7 Days
Schedule Days Recovered
~160 hrs
Equipment Hours Recovered
~300 hrs
Labor Hours Recovered
~65%
Risk Exposure Reduced
08

Procurement Recommendation

Big Bad Mats should be evaluated as a project cost optimization strategy rather than a commodity purchase. While unit price may exceed lower-cost alternatives, measurable reductions in downtime, schedule delays, equipment recovery, restoration, and operational risk can substantially improve overall project economics.

"The objective is not to purchase the least expensive mat. The objective is to deliver the lowest total installed project cost."

Discuss a project-specific analysis
(713) 725-7413 · kyle@oneharvestco.com
Request a Tailored Analysis
© 2026 OneHarvest LLC. Executive Procurement Brief — figures are illustrative estimates provided for evaluation purposes only. Not a quote, guarantee, or warranty of any specific result, and not financial, engineering, or legal advice. Actual outcomes vary by site conditions, equipment mix & schedule.